Paris Hilton Sex Video Internet Stardom
As I was reading Steven
Watson's "Factory Made: Warhol and the Sixties,' Paris
Hilton was dominating celebrity news with her underground
sex video and above-ground reality show, "Green Acres'
update, "The Simple Life.'
The pundits and columnists all were asking: Who was this
beautiful but trashy rich girl (of the Hilton hotel-chain
family) and why had she become famous without benefit of any
artistic accomplishment whatsoever? How had pop culture
become so indiscriminate?
The answers are in this book. Hilton's predecessors were
Andy Warhol consorts like Edie Sedgwick, Baby Jane Holzer,
Ingrid Superstar and Ultra Violet. Many of them, like
Hilton, were rebels from wealthy, high-society families.
They were promiscuous druggies and vain narcissists. They
couldn't sing or act but believed Warhol could make them
stars.
And he did, putting them in his underground movies and
letting paparazzi and gossip columnists follow their
alternative-society doings. They loved dancing and they
looked divine, especially when photographed at New York
parties and happenings.
In another time and place, they would have been demimonde
outcasts, Edith Wharton material. But in the 1960s, a youth
culture with its own rules was being born at the same time
Warhol was inventing and defining pop. And his avant-garde,
anti-authoritarian values - revolutionary in a subversively
democratic way that he, himself, didn't seem to understand -
still rule pop culture today. For better or worse.
To distill Warhol's contribution to American life down to
its essence, it meant the eradication of the bourgeois
notions of shame and hard work. Young people could do
anything they want and be famous for it, because they had
youth on their side.
As such, Paris Hilton is just the latest Andy Warhol
superstar. And, as such, her life may indeed have a profound
meaning, but don't hold your breath. After all, many in
Warhol's entourage were creative people alive to their
singularly creative times. And, although older than his
minions, he certainly was a creative artist in his own
right.
There have been plenty of books on Warhol and his
silver-foil-lined studio/bohemian clubhouse the Factory, of
course. And there also have been plenty both by and about
his extended-family entourage. Jean Stein and George
Plimpton's "Edie: American Girl' (about Sedgwick) was a
best-seller in 1982; numerous rock journalists have written
about the influence of Warhol's favorite band, the sinister
and innovative Velvet Underground.
Watson tries to bring all the elements - the art, the movies
and music, the hip bold fashions, the gay sensibilities, the
sexual frankness, the earth-shaking redefinition of
celebrity - together to show how Warhol culture gained
momentum in the 1960s and became pop culture.
His previous books include biographies of Gertrude Stein and
Virgil Thomson. An exhaustive researcher, Watson would seem
the right man for documenting all the points where Warhol's
interests and acquaintances intersect and move on.
Unfortunately, his book lacks momentum in its own right.
Using parallel construction, he so incessantly cuts back and
forth among his numerous subjects that we lose track of who
is doing what and when. Watson is attempting to shepherd all
the separate personalities of Warhol's scene together for
the story's big climax - the near-fatal 1968 shooting of
Warhol by the deranged superstar-wannabe Valerie Solanas.
But the opposite happens.
Also, although an index carefully lists and documents all of
Watson's sources, the book doesn't distinguish in its body
the origins of its many quotes. This gets especially
confusing because some of those quoted, including Warhol,
are dead. To whom did they say what and when?
But the book does have carefully detailed cultural
observations. Watson explains how Warhol's famous serial
prints of Campbell's soup cans, car crashes, flowers and the
like, as well as his primitive and static movies, became
influential. He also shows how his visual art galvanized the
public-at-large while his controversial movies remained more
obscure. Yet they derived from similar impulses.
"Andy has sought by repetition to show us that there is no
repetition really, that everything we look at is worthy of
our attention,' Watson quotes the late composer John Cage as
saying. "That's been the major direction for the 20th
century, it seems to me.'
It's been an ongoing question whether Warhol loved whatever
he saw around him - like a kid in a candy store - or whether
he was cleverly criticizing the banality of post-war
American consumer society. Warhol was an accomplished
commercial artist before crossing over to fine art in the
early 1960s.
Curiously, it was California rather than New York that gave
Warhol his breakthrough pop-art vision. Watson describes
how, on a trip to Los Angeles in 1963, Warhol saw
inspiration before him right on the streets: "The biggest
sensations of all were the signs and billboards along Sunset
Strip in Los Angeles: towering images, exaggerated colors,
reproductions that were hyper-real and improbably big. 'Oh,
this is America!' Andy repeatedly said."
Watson ultimately does establish how Warhol became the
father of our pop cultural nation. But, unlike Warhol, he
doesn't make it look easy. He's lucky he has such an
inherently fascinating subject.
|
|
Get The Downloaded Full Version Of
The Original Paris Hilton Sex Tape Video Now!
Free Paris Hilton Sex Tape
Everything you wanna know about
Paris Hilton and the Video Sex Tape
|